First Break Picking QC is one of the most expert-intensive steps. Geophysicists spend days manually reviewing thousands of seismograms to spot the few requiring correction.
The Time Cost:
Redirect expert time from inspection to interpretation—maximizing specialized skills while AI agents handle routine review at scale.
Interaction Agent:
Synthetic Geophysicist:
Initial pilots show significant time savings and measurable impact with expert-level AI accuracy:
Expansion Roadmap: Closed-Loop Agentic Processing
Our platform automates the most time-intensive processing steps using dual AI agents—a Synthetic Geophysicist and Interaction Agent. This system evaluates and filters thousands of seismograms automatically, enabling experts to focus exclusively on data requiring attention while significantly reducing processing cycles.
Early pilots demonstrate over 50% reduction in First Break Picking QC time, saving up to 14 days of expert effort per survey within typical 6-month processing workflows. These time savings translate directly into accelerated decision-making and improved capital efficiency.
No. Our platform augments expert capabilities by automating repetitive evaluation tasks while providing AI-scored assessments with transparent reasoning. Experts redirect their focus from routine inspection to high-value interpretation and decision-making.
For fields producing 20,000 barrels daily with $40 margins per barrel, one-week acceleration unlocks over $5.5 million in value. This represents immediate, measurable returns on AI implementation.
Our system interfaces seamlessly with industry-standard platforms, generating export-ready correction lists that integrate directly into Omega workflows. This enables smooth transitions from automated QC to expert review within established processing environments.
Yes. The underlying technology scales across additional seismic processing steps including velocity picking and tomography QC, with our roadmap targeting comprehensive closed-loop agentic processing capabilities.